O
Orange
← Community
Business JobsCommunity discussion

The Win~Dow restaurant

Orange

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (4)Opposed (2)Neutral (1)

At a glance

Public comments
7
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Jun 3, 2026.

Public comments (7)

SupportiveJeffrey GoodmanJun 3, 2026

The applicant described the restaurant as affordable and community-focused, noted nearly $500,000 spent so far and $4 million more planned, and promised about 50 local jobs.

Design Review Committee — June 3, 2026 · 11:33 →
OpposedDonnie DeWeesMay 20, 2026

OPPA's preservation chair called the project heavy-handed, saying seating, umbrellas, and landscaping overwhelm the historic buildings, and cited errors and missing information in the plans.

Design Review Committee — May 20, 2026 · 1:02:57 →
OpposedDiana ZdenekMay 20, 2026

OPPA representative objected to the six-foot tubular metal fence along Chapman and the lack of a landscape buffer, calling it a hard, security-oriented edge inconsistent with the historic district.

Design Review Committee — May 20, 2026 · 1:07:34 →
SupportiveJeff RabbittMay 20, 2026

The architect of record defended the project's care in preserving character-defining elements and explained the fence sits where the existing fence is, for after-hours security.

Design Review Committee — May 20, 2026 · 1:10:02 →
SupportiveMasa KleinhampleMay 20, 2026

The project designer explained the service-area layout, trash enclosure, and private dining pocket in the northeast corner.

Design Review Committee — May 20, 2026 · 1:15:33 →
SupportiveJeff GoodmanMay 20, 2026

The Win~Dow's founder described the concept: an approachable, park-like community gathering space with low prices, ambient music, and no bands or sports viewing.

Design Review Committee — May 20, 2026 · 1:19:35 →
NeutralAdam RothbardMay 20, 2026

The Historic Resources Group consultant confirmed the missing Secretary of the Interior Standard No. 6 in the report was an omission and that all standards were addressed.

Design Review Committee — May 20, 2026 · 1:32:36 →