Rexford warehouse at 2411 N. Glassell

Longtime resident said AQMD has raised serious air quality issues and diesel emissions would worsen health in an area already impacted by RJ Noble and freeway traffic.

Opposed the 24-hour operation, saying it would permanently and negatively alter the neighborhood with no acceptable mitigation.

Questioned why no full EIR was required given 200 semi-truck trips daily, 24/7 operations, and proximity to schools and homes; urged the commission to require an EIR.

Listed impacts of the 300,000-square-foot, 45-foot-tall warehouse with 38 loading docks and 556 daily trips, including pollution near schools and parks; asked the commission to deny it.

Presented the city's own cancer risk figures (10.07 in a million unmitigated, above the threshold of 10), the Orange Unified superintendent's letter, and the discrepancy between the analyzed 5-dock and actual 36-dock building versions; asked for denial or a full EIR.

Argued averages miss extreme events like freight rail surges and truck rerouting down Glassell; asked the commission to reject the project or at least require a full EIR.

Homeowner and mother warned of health and legal liability risks from approving the 24/7 warehouse near schools, invoking respiratory disease impacts on children.

Young resident asked the commission not to approve the project so she could play outside without diesel fumes.

40-year neighborhood resident worried the 900-foot-long, 45-foot-tall building would block ocean breezes and concentrate pollution; asked for a full EIR.

33-year resident across from the site cited traffic, pollution, noise, and property value loss; said neighbors keep showing up despite personal hardship.

Asked the commission to explore every legal avenue to deny the project entirely, saying it is inappropriate 60 feet from homes.

Speaking for her husband, highlighted the school district superintendent's letter and noted the project hearing has been postponed again, pledging continued opposition.

Lives near the site; says only two Orange warehouses are bigger and none sit next to a residential neighborhood, and demands a full EIR with realistic assumptions.

A father of two young boys, citing USC Children's Health Study data on diesel and kids' lungs, the 10.07-in-a-million cancer risk, and AB 98's 300-foot dock setback not addressed in the environmental document.

Formally opposes the 24/7, 36-dock facility next to homes, urging the commission to preserve Orange's small-town character.

A 28-year resident north of the site, urging denial and limits on future development to uses similar to the existing quiet office building.

Raised warehouse fire and disaster risks, citing the Lineage cold-storage fire in Boyle Heights and the company's history of fires, and asked for rejection or a full EIR.

A 32-year resident across the street who watched the project grow from three bays to a massive facility, describing existing diesel noise and a united neighborhood of 150 who attended the developer's open house.

Brought a visual showing homes within 100 feet of the project and demanded a full comprehensive environmental impact report.

A child resident who spoke about fumes near Fletcher Academy's playground, road damage, accidents, and sleep-depriving noise from 24-hour truck traffic.

A dog-walking resident whose husband has asthma, citing pollution, black lung concerns, and the close-knit character of the neighborhood.

A 40-year resident who detailed flaws in the mitigated negative declaration, including use of a Fullerton weather station eight miles away, missing curfew conditions, and inadequate noticing of homes.

A father raising a one-year-old about 75 feet from the site, opposing 24/7 operations and calling for genuine community engagement by the developer before any project of this intensity moves forward.

A homeowner directly next to the site who laid out the project facts, criticized the developer's lack of transparency, and asked the commission to reject the project when it comes before them.

A retiree who moved to be near grandkids, asking the commission to keep the project's scale near the existing four bays rather than 38 and reject 24/7 operations.

Opposed the warehouse, saying it can't coexist in harmony with the neighborhood and urging the council to reject it.

Cited recent warehouse fires and chemical leaks in the region, arguing 'high quality tenant' promises mean little given Lineage Logistics' fire record.

Retiree of ten years urged limits on truck bay hours, saying 24/7 diesel operations near Fletcher Elementary would harm kids.

Opposed the warehouse with a handout of concerns about the project's impacts.

Said Rexford's community meeting was a 'dog and pony show' with unrealistic assumptions in the environmental review; demanded a full EIR.

Presented a visual showing the warehouse's size versus Fletcher Academy, urging the council to protect 450-plus children from diesel soot.

Noted the Planning Commission hearing moved to September 21 and a Foothills Sentry article on neighborhood opposition; asked for a no vote if it reaches the council.