Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 9
- Last 30 days
- 9
Discussed at 1 meeting in the last 60 days; most recently Oct 14, 2026.
Public comments (9)
Worried displaced cars will flood nearby streets and trigger more permit parking requests; asked the commission to wait for a parking solution.
City Traffic Commission — October 14, 2026 · 30:46 →Described vans blocking sidewalks, people living in vehicles, crashes, and poor visibility; strongly supported the no-parking zone.
City Traffic Commission — October 14, 2026 · 33:13 →Glendora Street resident of 34 years supporting the no-parking zone.
City Traffic Commission — October 14, 2026 · 35:45 →Spoke in support, citing poor visibility on the curved street and drivers parallel parking into traffic.
City Traffic Commission — October 14, 2026 · 35:45 →Said buses and parked cars make the narrow street dangerous, especially at night and in bad weather.
City Traffic Commission — October 14, 2026 · 38:27 →The lone opponent: said the zone just pushes parking onto other streets and asked for targeted red curbs and enforcement instead.
City Traffic Commission — October 14, 2026 · 39:38 →Said pulling in and out of her driveway is dangerous with no visibility and horse trailers left on the street.
City Traffic Commission — October 14, 2026 · 42:21 →Cumberland resident describing blind spots when pulling out and near-misses while walking.
City Traffic Commission — October 14, 2026 · 42:59 →Cumberland resident citing public safety, people sleeping in cars, and children unable to walk to the park; asked for the restrictions.
City Traffic Commission — October 14, 2026 · 43:40 →